Suggested readings, 7 February 2021

Here are some interesting articles I've read over the past week I think are worth checking out.

Pat Leahy, “United Irelanders need to stop talking to themselves.” 30 Jan, Irish Times.

"[U]nited Irelanders have a lot of persuading to do. At the moment they seem to be talking mostly to themselves. But they will have to reach beyond nationalists if they are to assemble a majority."

Peter Singer, “Give up the meat - I’ve been doing it for 50 years.” 31 Jan, The Age.

"We stopped eating meat because we did not want to support the cruelties inflicted on farm animals, but even in 1971, concern for animals was not the only reason for avoiding factory farmed animal products."

Alberto Giubilini, “The UK should share the vaccine with the other countries – but only after all the vulnerable have been vaccinated.” 3 Feb, The Conversation.

"Vaccination delays in other countries translate into lives lost. So once the UK has vaccinated its most vulnerable people, there is a question whether it should give some of its vaccines to other countries."

Robert Langreth, “The Five Things to Get Right Before the Next Pandemic.” 3 Feb, Bloomberg.

(1) Pathogen surveillance; (2) Repairing and augmenting the WHO; (3) Genetic sequencing; (4) Developing more vaccines; (5) Ironing out distribution and logistics.

Tom Chivers, “Can the vaccine keep up with the Covid variants?” 3 Feb, UnHerd.

"The way to keep the number of mutations down is to keep the number of cases down. It’s fairly linear: if you have twice as many infected people, all else being equal, you have about twice as many chances for a virus throwing up some dangerous new mutation"

Kelsey Piper, “Smallpox used to kill millions of people every year. Here’s how humans beat it.” 5 Feb, Vox.

"In the broader context of humanity’s fight against infectious disease, it’s fair to think of the coronavirus as a close call. As bad as it has been, it could have been much worse. It could have been more transmissible; it could have been deadlier. Diseases far worse than Covid-19 have appeared throughout human history, and there’s every reason to believe we may someday face one again."

Richard Yetter Chappell, “There's No Such Thing as 'Following the Science'” 29 Jan, Philosophy, et cetera.

"I like science, and I like scientists. We should defer to them on empirical questions: what the facts are, and what the risks are. But they do not have the expertise to evaluate either those facts, or those risks. If you want to trust and follow the experts, you need more than just doctors and scientists at the table."

Comments

Should We Use Neuroenhancement Drugs to Improve Relationships?

A version of this article was printed in Humanism Ireland , July-August, Vol. 147 (2014) L ove, it is fair to say, is probably the strongest emotion we can experience. It can come in many different forms: love of one’s parent, sibling, or child. Though most people consider romantic relationships—which include companionship, sexual passion, intimacy, warmth, procreation and child-rearing—as the most significant component of one’s life; and it is probably the thing we find discussed more than anything else in novels, films and music. Committed romantic relationships tend to occur within the institution of marriage—something that is ubiquitous to most, if not all, cultures. Indeed, relationships today, which are primarily love-driven, are not just confined to marriages, as many couples sustain relationships outside of wedlock. Being in a love-driven relationship is considered important for most people, as it contributes to happiness—something we a...

Intuitions and Ethics

A version of this article was printed in Humanism Ireland , May-June, Vol. 146 (2014) The notion that our moral intuitions possess epistemic authority has been associated with a number of philosophers within the canon of Western thought. Roughly speaking, these thinkers have argued that our intuitions have recourse to a unique authority of perception that yields special access to a sphere of moral legitimacy. Others, however, have claimed that our intuitions are incredibly diverse and often conflict with each other—for example, your intuition says assisted suicide is morally permissible and my intuition says it’s wrong. But it seems the two contrasting intuitions cannot both be right. At the same time, most of us think our own moral intuitions are right : they do not seem inconsistent to us, and we have a strong sense to believe them. Accordingly, they strike us as correct. Undoubtedly, moral intuitions can be shaped by our particular culture, environment or co...

The ethics of high-tech “conversion” therapy

An edited version of this article was printed in Humanism Ireland , September-October, Vol. 148 (2014) I n an earlier post I discussed the imminent prospect of biological manipulating our different love systems and some of the ethical implications that might follow from it. This topic originally appeared in an article published in 2008 by Oxford ethicists Julian Savulescu and Anders Sandberg, who argue that it might be possible, in the next number of decades or so, to biologically manipulate and enhance our quality of love. They propose that we could supplement our relationship counselling sessions with prescription ‘love drugs’—ones with the purpose of improving intimacy and commitment between partners. With emerging biotechnologies like this, which includes recent work in neuroscience, psychopharmacology and other related areas, it will also be possible to consider the prospect of using them to manipulate brain systems to diminish and alter the capacity fr...

Nothing as It Seems

Search This Blog