Suggested readings, 27 December 2020

Here are some interesting articles I've read over the past week I think are worth checking out.

Julian Baggini, “If everyone has a right to be heard, why are some told to keep quiet?” 16 Dec, The Philosophical Inquirer.

"All historically oppressed groups are rightly against having the values of their oppressors imposed upon them and no group has a right to tell another what to do. However, the remedy for this should be to give everyone equal voice, not to create new hierarchies of privilege."

Stuart Ritchie, “Autism isn’t always a superpower.” 22 Dec, UnHerd.

"All I ask is that, in our understandable desire to focus on the hitherto-forgotten talents of those with neurodivergent brains, we don’t forget the plight of those on the other end of the spectrum. Somewhere between thirty and forty percent of people with autism also have a learning disability, like the boy from my old job. Those with lower levels of functioning might never produce a breakthrough invention, or come up with a quirky way of explaining humanity using science. But they deserve no less of our attention, no less of our support, and no less of our empathy."

Marianna Spring, “How should you talk to friends and relatives who believe conspiracy theories?” 21 Dec, BBC News.

How do you talk to people about conspiracy theories without ruining Christmas? 1 Keep calm; 2 Don't be dismissive; 3 Encourage critical thinking; 4 Ask questions; 5 Don't expect immediate results.

Nathan Nobis, “Moral Extremism and Abortion: On Pro-Choice 'Extremists'” 19 Dec, Abortion Arguments (Blog).

A lot has been written about anti-abortion extremists, but probably not as much on pro-choice extremists. This short post points out that you can expect to find intolerant extremists on all side of the issue. "Ultimately, because extremists refuse to engage in giving reasons and seeking productive discussions on important issues when the issues are complex and so there are plausible concerns on contrary sides of the issues."

Julian Baggini, “The Covid sceptics have made a basic philosophical mistake.” 18 Dec, Prospect.

"The doubters may think they are upholding a proud tradition of robust scepticism but the truth is they betray a lack of understanding of the inevitable uncertainties of evidence and realities of fairness."

Comments

Should We Use Neuroenhancement Drugs to Improve Relationships?

A version of this article was printed in Humanism Ireland , July-August, Vol. 147 (2014) L ove, it is fair to say, is probably the strongest emotion we can experience. It can come in many different forms: love of one’s parent, sibling, or child. Though most people consider romantic relationships—which include companionship, sexual passion, intimacy, warmth, procreation and child-rearing—as the most significant component of one’s life; and it is probably the thing we find discussed more than anything else in novels, films and music. Committed romantic relationships tend to occur within the institution of marriage—something that is ubiquitous to most, if not all, cultures. Indeed, relationships today, which are primarily love-driven, are not just confined to marriages, as many couples sustain relationships outside of wedlock. Being in a love-driven relationship is considered important for most people, as it contributes to happiness—something we a...

Is Adult Incest Wrong?

An version of this article was printed in Humanism Ireland , March-April, Vol. 151 (2015) Incest is something most people find morally objectionable and it's one of the most common of all cultural taboos. The British Medical Association’s Complete Family Health Encyclopaedia (1990) defines incest as “ intercourse between close relatives,” that usually includes “intercourse with a parent, a son or daughter, a brother or sister, an uncle or aunt, a nephew or niece, a grandparent or grandchild.” The Oxford English Dictionary ’s definition is a little broader: it doesn’t confine incest to just intercourse, but to “sexual relations between people classified as being too closely related to marry each other.” Most countries have some kind of law against incest—though consensual adult incest is not a crime in France, Spain, Russia the Netherlands, and a host of countries in South America. In England and Wales, however, t he Sexual Offences Act 2003 ...

Intuitions and Ethics

A version of this article was printed in Humanism Ireland , May-June, Vol. 146 (2014) The notion that our moral intuitions possess epistemic authority has been associated with a number of philosophers within the canon of Western thought. Roughly speaking, these thinkers have argued that our intuitions have recourse to a unique authority of perception that yields special access to a sphere of moral legitimacy. Others, however, have claimed that our intuitions are incredibly diverse and often conflict with each other—for example, your intuition says assisted suicide is morally permissible and my intuition says it’s wrong. But it seems the two contrasting intuitions cannot both be right. At the same time, most of us think our own moral intuitions are right : they do not seem inconsistent to us, and we have a strong sense to believe them. Accordingly, they strike us as correct. Undoubtedly, moral intuitions can be shaped by our particular culture, environment or co...

Nothing as It Seems

Search This Blog