Suggested readings, 4 October 2020

Here are some interesting articles I've read over the past week that I think are worth checking out.

James Harold, “Is it rational to condemn an artwork for an artist’s personal immorality?” 3 Oct, OUP Blog.

Should we appreciate art created by bad people?

Shane Timmons, “The pandemic isn't down to one reckless group - it's because of the contagiousness of Covid-19.” 2 Oct, Journal.ie.

"Social disapproval of non-compliance is important for maintaining the high levels of cooperation we’ve seen in Ireland, but it should be proportionate to the transgression and come from appropriate sources."

Jeff McMahan, “How Britain and the US became trapped in the nationalism of decline.” 2 Oct, New Statesman.

Philosopher Jeff McMahan argues that the contempt shown by Britain and the United States for international law is a betrayal of the postwar order they both helped to create.

Mariana Mazzucato, Reda Cherif and Fuad Hasanov, “How to End the Pandemic This Year.” 1 Oct, Project Syndicate.

Even without a vaccine, the Covid-19 could be ended within months through an effective universal testing programme.

Tom Chivers, “Has Covid become less dangerous?” 30 Sep, Project UnHerd.

The virus hasn't really changed, but death rates have declined largely because doctors are dealing with it better and it is now mostly infecting younger people.

Fintan O'Toole, “My father wanted to die and I promised to help him.” 29 Sep, Irish Times.

"Many people are instinctively repelled by the idea of legalising assisted dying – but if you ask them what they want for themselves if terminal illness makes their lives unbearable, they too want this choice."

Comments

Should We Use Neuroenhancement Drugs to Improve Relationships?

A version of this article was printed in Humanism Ireland , July-August, Vol. 147 (2014) L ove, it is fair to say, is probably the strongest emotion we can experience. It can come in many different forms: love of one’s parent, sibling, or child. Though most people consider romantic relationships—which include companionship, sexual passion, intimacy, warmth, procreation and child-rearing—as the most significant component of one’s life; and it is probably the thing we find discussed more than anything else in novels, films and music. Committed romantic relationships tend to occur within the institution of marriage—something that is ubiquitous to most, if not all, cultures. Indeed, relationships today, which are primarily love-driven, are not just confined to marriages, as many couples sustain relationships outside of wedlock. Being in a love-driven relationship is considered important for most people, as it contributes to happiness—something we a...

Is Adult Incest Wrong?

An version of this article was printed in Humanism Ireland , March-April, Vol. 151 (2015) Incest is something most people find morally objectionable and it's one of the most common of all cultural taboos. The British Medical Association’s Complete Family Health Encyclopaedia (1990) defines incest as “ intercourse between close relatives,” that usually includes “intercourse with a parent, a son or daughter, a brother or sister, an uncle or aunt, a nephew or niece, a grandparent or grandchild.” The Oxford English Dictionary ’s definition is a little broader: it doesn’t confine incest to just intercourse, but to “sexual relations between people classified as being too closely related to marry each other.” Most countries have some kind of law against incest—though consensual adult incest is not a crime in France, Spain, Russia the Netherlands, and a host of countries in South America. In England and Wales, however, t he Sexual Offences Act 2003 ...

Intuitions and Ethics

A version of this article was printed in Humanism Ireland , May-June, Vol. 146 (2014) The notion that our moral intuitions possess epistemic authority has been associated with a number of philosophers within the canon of Western thought. Roughly speaking, these thinkers have argued that our intuitions have recourse to a unique authority of perception that yields special access to a sphere of moral legitimacy. Others, however, have claimed that our intuitions are incredibly diverse and often conflict with each other—for example, your intuition says assisted suicide is morally permissible and my intuition says it’s wrong. But it seems the two contrasting intuitions cannot both be right. At the same time, most of us think our own moral intuitions are right : they do not seem inconsistent to us, and we have a strong sense to believe them. Accordingly, they strike us as correct. Undoubtedly, moral intuitions can be shaped by our particular culture, environment or co...

Nothing as It Seems

Search This Blog