Suggested readings, 6 September 2020

Here are a small number of interesting articles I’ve read over the past week that I think are worth checking out.

Daniel McConnell, “Dignity law would have allowed Marie Fleming die in peace.” 5 Sep, Irish Examiner.

Ireland should introduce legalised assistance in dying: "The time has come to extend that debate to consider allowing people to determine how they leave this earth with a meaningful degree of dignity. We can no longer bury our heads in the sand".

Barry J Whyte, Aaron Rogan and Killian Woods, “Mask hysteria.” 30 Aug, Business Post.

Very good piece on what can happen when extremist movements and conspiracy theories move into the political mainstream during a pandemic.

Emily Oster, “How the media has us thinking all wrong about the coronavirus.” 25 Aug, Washington Post.

Economist and author Emily Oster argues that in evaluating the risk of Covid-19 spreading, we should follow the trend lines, not the headlines. She also reminds us of our common cognitive biases, including the negativity bias and the availability heuristic.

David P. Barash, “Just Because It’s Natural Doesn’t Mean It’s Good.” 19 Aug, Nautilus.

"Given a choice, most people gravitate toward the natural over the artificial. After all, natural environments are preferable to garbage dumps, natural foods are nearly always healthier than stuff concocted in a chemistry lab. Yet it needs to be said loud and clear: Just because something is natural doesn’t mean it’s good. 'Smallpox is natural,' Ogden Nash noted. 'Vaccine ain’t.' Gangrene, acne, hurricanes, earthquakes, COVID-19 -- all bona fide natural".

Peter Singer and Joanna Masel, “How (Not) to Fight COVID-19.” 3 Sep, Project Syndicate.

Philosopher Peter Singer and biologist Joanna Masel argue that more flexible rules and the use of new technologies can help us reduce the spread of the virus.

Tom Chivers, “Let’s all meet up in the year 3000.” 2 Sep, UnHerd.

Science writer Tom Chivers makes the bold claim that aging may not be inevitable, and in the future could be curable like other diseases and illnesses. If we could slow down the aging process in humans and live to be, say, 1,000 years old,

is that something we'd personally want, and is it socially practicable?

For a more philosophical discussion, you can listen to Francesca Minerva talk about the ethics of cryonics and life extension here.

Comments

Should We Use Neuroenhancement Drugs to Improve Relationships?

A version of this article was printed in Humanism Ireland , July-August, Vol. 147 (2014) L ove, it is fair to say, is probably the strongest emotion we can experience. It can come in many different forms: love of one’s parent, sibling, or child. Though most people consider romantic relationships—which include companionship, sexual passion, intimacy, warmth, procreation and child-rearing—as the most significant component of one’s life; and it is probably the thing we find discussed more than anything else in novels, films and music. Committed romantic relationships tend to occur within the institution of marriage—something that is ubiquitous to most, if not all, cultures. Indeed, relationships today, which are primarily love-driven, are not just confined to marriages, as many couples sustain relationships outside of wedlock. Being in a love-driven relationship is considered important for most people, as it contributes to happiness—something we a...

Should we repeal the Eighth Amendment?

Ireland will have a referendum on whether abortion should be permitted on 25th May. A referendum has to be held in order to alter the constitution. In 1983 voters approved of the Eighth Amendment – which created a constitutional recognition that gives equal status to the unborn and the mother – but requests to have it repealed have been steadily increasing in the past number years. In January, the Taoiseach, Leo Varadkar, said Ireland’s abortion laws are “too restrictive and need to be reformed”. If the amendment is repealed, the government may introduce legislation permitting unrestricted abortion up to 12 weeks of pregnancy. At present, terminations are only permissible when the life of the mother is at risk, and under law anyone who seeks an abortion could potentially face 14 years in prison. Opponents of abortion, to be sure, see this as a moral horror, but the 12-week limit being proposed is fairly similar to abortion laws across Europe. Abort...

Intuitions and Ethics

A version of this article was printed in Humanism Ireland , May-June, Vol. 146 (2014) The notion that our moral intuitions possess epistemic authority has been associated with a number of philosophers within the canon of Western thought. Roughly speaking, these thinkers have argued that our intuitions have recourse to a unique authority of perception that yields special access to a sphere of moral legitimacy. Others, however, have claimed that our intuitions are incredibly diverse and often conflict with each other—for example, your intuition says assisted suicide is morally permissible and my intuition says it’s wrong. But it seems the two contrasting intuitions cannot both be right. At the same time, most of us think our own moral intuitions are right : they do not seem inconsistent to us, and we have a strong sense to believe them. Accordingly, they strike us as correct. Undoubtedly, moral intuitions can be shaped by our particular culture, environment or co...

Nothing as It Seems

Search This Blog