Skip to main content

Suggested readings, 13 September 2020

 

Here are some interesting articles I have read over the past week that I think are worth checking out.

Colin Murphy, “Remote working revolution is now in our hands. 6 Sep, Business Post
Covid-19 has given us a chance to get ahead by embracing remote working: "A crucial benefit in Ireland would be reduced pressure on urban housing, and an accompanying boon to the country’s struggling small towns. Perhaps most obvious, but most difficult to measure, would be the increase in health and happiness resulting from more people structuring their working lives around their home and family lives, rather than the other way round."

Maarten Boudry, “The Warped Epistemology of Conspiracy Theories.” 8 Sep, APA Blog
Maarten Boudry, a philosopher of science, asks why conspiracy theories are so timeless and pervasive. 

Kent A. Peacock and John R. Vokey, “Placebo arms aren’t needed for challenge trials of Covid-19 vaccines.” 3 Sep, Stat News
This piece argues that it does not make sense to give placebos to some of those who volunteer for challenge trials -- that is, where participants are deliberately exposed to the virus -- of Covid-19 vaccines.

Daniel Dennett, “Why Are We in the West So Weird? A Theory.” 12 Sep, New York Times. 
Philosopher Daniel Dennett reviews Joseph Henrich's new book entitled The WEIRDest People in the World. "According to Joseph Henrich [an anthropologist at Harvard], some unknown early church fathers about a thousand years later promulgated the edict: Don’t marry your cousin! Why they did this is also unclear, but if Henrich is right...this prohibition changed the face of the world, by eventually creating societies and people that were WEIRD: Western, educated, industrialized, rich, democratic."

Nathan Nobis, “Is the "bodily autonomy" argument for abortion *that* simple?” 11 Sep, Abortion Arguments (Blog)
It is sometimes assumed that "the right to bodily autonomy" claim, often used to justify abortion, is self-evidently true. Philosopher Nathan Nobis, however, points out that, on closer examination, things are not so straight forward. Proponents of bodily autonomy may have to come up with sophisticated arguments to ground their position and, of course, to convince their opponents -- chants and assertions will not suffice.    

Kenan Malik, “When Monuments Fall.” 9 Sep, New York Review of Books
British writer and journalist Kenan Malik has a pretty nuanced take here on why we war over statues. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should We Use Neuroenhancement Drugs to Improve Relationships?

A version of this article was printed in  Humanism Ireland , July-August, Vol. 147 (2014)   L ove, it is fair to say, is probably the strongest emotion we can experience. It can come in many different forms:  love of one’s parent, sibling, or child. Though most people consider romantic relationships—which include companionship, sexual passion, intimacy, warmth, procreation and child-rearing—as the most significant component of one’s life; and it is probably the thing we find discussed more than anything else in novels, films and music. Committed romantic relationships tend to occur within the institution of marriage—something that is ubiquitous to most, if not all, cultures.   Indeed, relationships today, which are primarily love-driven, are not just confined to marriages, as many couples sustain relationships outside of wedlock. Being in a love-driven relationship is considered important for most people, as it contributes to happiness—something we a...

Intuitions and Ethics

A version of this article was printed in  Humanism Ireland , May-June, Vol. 146 (2014) The notion that our moral intuitions possess epistemic authority has been associated with a number of philosophers within the canon of Western thought.  Roughly speaking, these thinkers have argued that our intuitions have recourse to a unique authority of perception that yields special access to a sphere of moral legitimacy. Others, however, have claimed that our intuitions are incredibly diverse and often conflict with each other—for example, your intuition says assisted suicide is morally permissible and my intuition says it’s wrong. But it seems the two contrasting intuitions cannot both be right. At the same time, most of us think our own moral intuitions are right : they do not seem inconsistent to us, and we have a strong sense to believe them. Accordingly, they strike us as correct. Undoubtedly, moral intuitions can be shaped by our particular culture, environment or co...

The new Irish hate speech law will do more harm than good

The government of the Republic of Ireland is  currently proposing  a new hate speech law, as part of the Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) Bill, which would update the Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act 1989. It  is argued  the existing law, particularly on account of the presence of social media, is insufficient. The aim is to give more power to prosecutors in order to make the issuing of convictions easier. Under the current law, defendants can appeal their charges by proving they did not have the intention of transmitting hatred; however, the new legislation will consider defendants liable even if their actions were not intentional. You can read the rest of the article here .