Skip to main content

Suggested readings, 30 August 2020

Illustration by Anders Nilsen

Here are a small number of interesting articles I’ve read over the past week that I think are worth considering.

Aaron E. Carroll, “When It Comes to Covid-19, Most of Us Have Risk Exactly Backward.” 28 Aug, New York Times. 
Risk-taking decisions are not all-or-none: if we loosen Covid restrictions in some areas, we should be increasing our restrictions in others. 

Diana Fleischman, “Practical Veganism.” 28 Aug, Works in Progress. 
This essay makes the case that vegans and animal rights campaigners, instead of pushing for an all-or-nothing approach, should be more open to encouraging others to consume less animal products -- particularly factory farmed fish, eggs, and chicken -- as a strategy to reduce suffering. 
Article considers a number of reasons why Covid-19 deaths are not rising despite cases surge.

Saloni Dattani, “When will the Covid-19 vaccine arrive?” 28 Aug, UnHerd. 
Inspired by superforecasters like Philip Tetlock and Dan Gardner, who have a broad understanding of various areas and disciplines in their approach to making forecasts, Dattani estimates there's a 50/50 chance we'll have an effective Covid-19 vaccine available by spring 2021, and that it's unlikely we still won't have one before the end of next year.  

Philip Bethge and Rafaela von Bredow, “Is Nuclear Power the Solution to Climate Change?” 14 Aug, Der Spiegel. 
Paul Dorfman of the Energy Institute, University College London, and advisor to the Irish government on radiation risk, and Staffan Qvist, co-author of A Bright Future, debate the merits of nuclear power as an effective, clean energy source. Dorfman claims that relying on nuclear power isn't a feasible option because it is so expense and due to unavoidable security concerns. Qvist, on the other hand, argues that building more nuclear reactors is the fastest, safest option for decarbonising the energy sector.   

Bill McKibben, “130 Degrees.” 20 Aug, New York Review of Books. 
Bill McKibben, founder of 350.org and Schumann ­Distinguished Scholar at Middlebury, reviews Mark Lynas' new book, Our Final Warning: Six Degrees of Climate Emergency. 

"His new volume echoes that earlier work, which was by no means cheerful. But because scientists have spent the last decade dramatically increasing understanding of the Earth’s systems, and because our societies wasted that decade by pouring ever more carbon into the atmosphere, this book—impeccably sourced and careful to hew to the wide body of published research—is far, far darker." 

You can also listen to Lynas talk about his new book on the 80,000 Hours podcast. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should We Use Neuroenhancement Drugs to Improve Relationships?

A version of this article was printed in  Humanism Ireland , July-August, Vol. 147 (2014)   L ove, it is fair to say, is probably the strongest emotion we can experience. It can come in many different forms:  love of one’s parent, sibling, or child. Though most people consider romantic relationships—which include companionship, sexual passion, intimacy, warmth, procreation and child-rearing—as the most significant component of one’s life; and it is probably the thing we find discussed more than anything else in novels, films and music. Committed romantic relationships tend to occur within the institution of marriage—something that is ubiquitous to most, if not all, cultures.   Indeed, relationships today, which are primarily love-driven, are not just confined to marriages, as many couples sustain relationships outside of wedlock. Being in a love-driven relationship is considered important for most people, as it contributes to happiness—something we a...
1 comment
Read more

Is Adult Incest Wrong?

An version of this article was printed in  Humanism Ireland , March-April, Vol. 151 (2015)   Incest is something most people find morally objectionable and it's one of the most common of all cultural taboos. The British Medical Association’s Complete Family Health Encyclopaedia (1990) defines incest as “ intercourse between close relatives,” that usually includes “intercourse with a parent, a son or daughter, a brother or sister, an uncle or aunt, a nephew or niece, a grandparent or grandchild.” The Oxford English Dictionary ’s definition is a little broader: it doesn’t confine incest to just intercourse, but to “sexual relations between people classified as being too closely related to marry each other.”    Most countries have some kind of law against incest—though consensual adult incest is not a crime in France, Spain, Russia the Netherlands, and a host of countries in South America. In England and Wales, however, t he Sexual Offences Act 2003 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The ethics of high-tech “conversion” therapy

An edited version of this article was printed in  Humanism Ireland , September-October, Vol. 148 (2014) I n an earlier post I discussed the imminent prospect of biological manipulating our different love systems and some of the ethical implications that might follow from it. This topic originally appeared in an article published in 2008 by Oxford ethicists Julian Savulescu and Anders Sandberg, who argue that it might be possible, in the next number of decades or so, to biologically manipulate and enhance our quality of love. They propose that we could supplement our relationship counselling sessions with prescription ‘love drugs’—ones with the purpose of improving intimacy and commitment between partners.  With emerging biotechnologies like this, which includes recent work in neuroscience, psychopharmacology and other related areas, it will also be possible to consider the prospect of using them to manipulate brain systems to diminish and alter the capacity fr...
2 comments
Read more