After reading Ronan McGreevy’s article
in the Irish Times (22nd November 2013) I imagine he was deliberately
making an effort to be provocative. If it was not for the immeasurable level of
non-human animal cruelty and suffering that occurs every day as a result of
Ireland’s meat consumption, McGreevy’s feature might have been more
amusing. It is surprising, and indeed
disappointing, that the Irish Times
would consider printing a piece as uninformed, misleading and compassionless as
this.
A meat-free diet is practiced for a number of reasons—ethical, health, religious and cultural—and contrary to McGreevy’s depiction of vegetarians simply having a “misplaced sentiment towards farm animals,” many have reflected on the problem of eating animal flesh on the basis of moral reasoning. Writers such as Montaigne and Erasmus criticised the abuse of animals in butchery and Leonardo da Vinci himself was a vegetarian. In the 19th century, scholars like Jeremy Bentham and Arthur Schopenhauer both held that our moral concerns ought to expand so to include animals. Since the 1970s various philosophers and animal rights activists have argued that our moral reasoning point towards a vegetarian diet (at least). In this way, our moral circle that includes the consideration of family, tribe, nation and species, ought to be extended to take into account the interest of all sentient beings.
A meat-free diet is practiced for a number of reasons—ethical, health, religious and cultural—and contrary to McGreevy’s depiction of vegetarians simply having a “misplaced sentiment towards farm animals,” many have reflected on the problem of eating animal flesh on the basis of moral reasoning. Writers such as Montaigne and Erasmus criticised the abuse of animals in butchery and Leonardo da Vinci himself was a vegetarian. In the 19th century, scholars like Jeremy Bentham and Arthur Schopenhauer both held that our moral concerns ought to expand so to include animals. Since the 1970s various philosophers and animal rights activists have argued that our moral reasoning point towards a vegetarian diet (at least). In this way, our moral circle that includes the consideration of family, tribe, nation and species, ought to be extended to take into account the interest of all sentient beings.
Fortunately western culture has seen a rising
intolerance of violence towards non-human animals over the past 50 years, and
it’s not improbable that a future society will regard our present consumption
of animal flesh as morally troubling as we now view slavery, the subjection of
women, racial apartheid and corporeal punishment of children.
McGreevy offers a number of ridiculous arguments
counter to vegetarianism. Firstly, he states that it’s “a wholly unnatural
state.” But what moral relevance does unnaturalness have in any case? Almost all modern agricultural production
impedes nature in some way. In any case, the captivity and butchery of sentient
beings in factory farmed houses, where most meat is produced worldwide, is not
everyone’s idea of natural either.
He goes on to say that eating meat is central to
our culture. No doubt this is true; meat has been a central part of our
national diet for a long time. However, just because some custom is part of a
culture doesn't make it morally defensible. Ireland has a culture of impunity
of corrupt bankers, but that does not morally excuse the continuation of
embezzlement or insider trading.
Many are vegetarian for other reasons
that McGreevy also fails to consider. A vegetarian diet is better for the
environment. Meat production is deemed to be one of the main contributors to
global warming, loss of biodiversity and fresh water scarcity. The Food and
Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Livestock’s Long
Shadow report estimates that current meat production causes 19% of total
anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions.
A more
recent study, though, puts this figure as high as 51%.
Many consider a vegetarian diet to be healthier
than a meat based one. Studies have shown that vegetarians are less likely to
be obese. In light of a recent
report that predicts a very high quantity of people living in Ireland are
expected to be overweight or obese by 2030, this might be a good time for one
to contemplate a vegetarian diet. Additionally, the results of a
major 28 year study published in Archives
of Internal Medicine last year, suggest that
eating red meat significantly increases the risk of death from heart disease
and cancer.
Finally, McGreevy seems to imply that vegetarian food is boring and
bland—that is, “something faintly edible.” Nothing could be further from the
truth. Many vegetarians will confirm that turning away from their earlier diet gave
them the opportunity to explore diverse and interesting recipes that they
wouldn't have discerned otherwise. If McGreevy isn't convinced, there are several restaurants around with
quality vegetarian and vegan food options for him to think again.
Comments
Post a Comment